Home of the pro-Internet community

The Latest

The Latest

Honestly, it's baffling how poorly Congress seems to understand the Internet. If they think it's 1984, we'll show them 1984.

Article by Sam Thielman for the Guardian

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on Monday said a controversial new surveillance bill could sweep away “important privacy protections”, a move that bodes ill for the measure’s return to the floor of the Senate this week.

On the creepy side of things...even your battery life now also identifies your activities online. 

Article by Alex Hern for The Guardian 

A little-known feature of the HTML5 specification means that websites can find out how much battery power a visitor has left on their laptop or smartphone – and now, security researchers have warned that that information can be used to track browsers online.

It's time for Europe to turn back from this misguided path of Internet content regulation before more damage to the open Internet is done.

Article by Jeff John Roberts for Fortune

Google finally said enough is enough when it comes to Europe censoring its search results. It issued a bold challenge to France.

No subsidies, no hidden fees, no contracts. Too good to be true? 

Article by Tom Meitner for Cufflinked Magazine

Cell phone bills have become a necessary evil in this country.

While one can fairly easily advocate for cutting the cord to your cable TV, owning a cell phone is pretty much demanded out of our lifestyles.

There is no doubt that technological change has hit newspaper publishers as well as other copyright owners. But a backward-looking law that penalizes innovators and threatens free speech on the Internet is not the solution.

Article by Joe Mullin for Arstechnica

study commissioned by Spanish publishers has found that a new intellectual property law passed in Spain last year, which charges news aggregators like Google for showing snippets and linking to news stories, has done substantial damage to the Spanish news industry.

A two-tiered Internet? We can do better. At the end of the day, Mark Zuckerberg’s controversial Internet[dot]org service only offers a slice of the internet, undermines security and privacy, and raises serious questions about how the program will impact local innovation. Speak out at

Article by Joshua Levy for Medium

No Big Industry interests were harmed in the making of this agreement. 

Article by Jordan Pearson at Motherboard

At a luxury hotel in Maui, representatives from the 12 countries participating in the highly controversial and secretive Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal are negotiatingbehind closed doors. Thanks to a secret letter from a 2013 meeting, released today by WikiLeaks, we now have a clearer idea of what they’re discussing.

This is why any censorship of content should at a minimum involve a transparent judicial process. This man tried to hide history for his own selfish ends...

Article by BBC News

A man involved in a £51m VAT scam has lost a legal bid to have news stories about him removed from Google under the so-called "right to be forgotten".

Malcolm Edwards originally applied for an injunction forcing five media organisations including the BBC to remove their articles about him.

The US government will have big-brother spy powers over the entire web. Our friends at Fight For The Future came up with an ingenious #faxbigbrother campaign. Check out this Time coverage and speak out at like in the '80s! #FaxBigBrother #StopCISA

Article by Nolan Freeney for Time Magazine

"We figured we’d use some 80s technology to try to get our point across"

The Indian government is in the middle of determining whether or not it will allow Big Telecom giants to create slow lanes for Internet users online, and has come out against Mark Zuckerberg's controversial Internet[dot]org service. You can learn more below, and speak out against Facebook's fake Internet service at

Article by TechDirt

India's government has finally released the country's recommendations for new net neutrality protections, and the report makes it very clear: they're not impressed with Mark Zuckerberg's vision of a Facebook-dominated, walled-garden Internet future.